<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Culture of Innovation is the Key to Our Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Schoepke</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Schoepke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 09:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Here is a swell equation for you all see if you can decipher it....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Pirate Bay + Wikileaks + Flattr + the Pirate Party = Unstoppable positive social, economic,  and environment change!  Go Swedes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a swell equation for you all see if you can decipher it&#8230;.</p>
<p>The Pirate Bay + Wikileaks + Flattr + the Pirate Party = Unstoppable positive social, economic,  and environment change!  Go Swedes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Schoepke</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Schoepke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-190</guid>
		<description>How collaborative a company is will be the defining characteristic of it&#039;s success or failure in the new economy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How collaborative a company is will be the defining characteristic of it&#39;s success or failure in the new economy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidhodgson</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>davidhodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I like that concept of deep culture, and that it is a culture of global well-being. Some thoughts arise for me - is a culture defined by what it values? A culture is the emergent set of behaviors that arise from human interaction within a system. Those behaviors will tend to align with what is valued by the largest number of people within that culture. There is a definite current moving in the direction of a global, ecological, compassionate culture that is assisted by the wiring up of our planetary nervous system. Another frame for this emerging deep culture could be that it is a global social culture. Moving away from the individualistic to the communal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that concept of deep culture, and that it is a culture of global well-being. Some thoughts arise for me &#8211; is a culture defined by what it values? A culture is the emergent set of behaviors that arise from human interaction within a system. Those behaviors will tend to align with what is valued by the largest number of people within that culture. There is a definite current moving in the direction of a global, ecological, compassionate culture that is assisted by the wiring up of our planetary nervous system. Another frame for this emerging deep culture could be that it is a global social culture. Moving away from the individualistic to the communal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Gillgren</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Gillgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful article, David. I also like the &quot;deep innovation&quot; concept. Strangely enough I find myself balking at the use of &quot;culture.&quot; Even though I also catch myself referring to &quot;corporate culture,&quot; and while there can be useful conversations about culture at that level, a case could be made that we are are now, in this age, witnessing to and participating in the emergence of a &quot;deep culture&quot; that is at that unsettling, half-painted room moment, in which nothing feels quite right. I&#039;m tempted to try to further label what this &quot;deep culture&quot; would be (a culture of global well-being?), but it seems premature. But I hesitate toward slanting it too soon toward conformity or innovation. That said, the conversation you have opened is vital. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful article, David. I also like the &#8220;deep innovation&#8221; concept. Strangely enough I find myself balking at the use of &#8220;culture.&#8221; Even though I also catch myself referring to &#8220;corporate culture,&#8221; and while there can be useful conversations about culture at that level, a case could be made that we are are now, in this age, witnessing to and participating in the emergence of a &#8220;deep culture&#8221; that is at that unsettling, half-painted room moment, in which nothing feels quite right. I&#39;m tempted to try to further label what this &#8220;deep culture&#8221; would be (a culture of global well-being?), but it seems premature. But I hesitate toward slanting it too soon toward conformity or innovation. That said, the conversation you have opened is vital. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidhodgson</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>davidhodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tim. I was actually going to quote something you said the other day about an algorithm for innovation, but the piece shifted direction :) And yes I believe you are correct about the quote. I haven&#039;t read it directly, and last time I was looking for the source I came across a similiar set of confusions. Seems that it may actually be from Clarence Darrow - &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.answers.com/Q/It_is_not_the_strongest_of_the_species_that_survive_nor_the_most_intelligent_but_the_one_most_responsive_to_change_What_is_this_mean&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wiki.answers.com/Q/It_is_not_the_stronge...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim. I was actually going to quote something you said the other day about an algorithm for innovation, but the piece shifted direction <img src='http://theideahive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And yes I believe you are correct about the quote. I haven&#39;t read it directly, and last time I was looking for the source I came across a similiar set of confusions. Seems that it may actually be from Clarence Darrow &#8211; <a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/It_is_not_the_strongest_of_the_species_that_survive_nor_the_most_intelligent_but_the_one_most_responsive_to_change_What_is_this_mean" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/It_is_not_the_stronge" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.answers.com/Q/It_is_not_the_stronge</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidhodgson</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>davidhodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-166</guid>
		<description>That is a good point. There is a dynamic tension to be found in the dance between the polarities. The conformist tendency holds the shape of the system together, the creative tendency is to shift the shape of the system. There is a dynamic interplay between those, just as there also is between the collaborative and the competitive. It is also true that not all aspects of a culture are positioned similarly on a graph (the food of a culture maybe much more conformist than the use of technology for instance). So a group culture is reflected by a fuzzy blob on such a graph, not by a point. However my position is that we need to be aware of these dynamics, and we need to be consciously encouraging those aspects of culture that shift more to the creative and collaborative, to be able to adapt to the deep systemic forces. In such situations of duress many systems actually do the opposite and become more conformist and more competitive, they take refuge in the familiar as it provides the illusion of safety - but that response reduces the viability of the system to changed circumstance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a good point. There is a dynamic tension to be found in the dance between the polarities. The conformist tendency holds the shape of the system together, the creative tendency is to shift the shape of the system. There is a dynamic interplay between those, just as there also is between the collaborative and the competitive. It is also true that not all aspects of a culture are positioned similarly on a graph (the food of a culture maybe much more conformist than the use of technology for instance). So a group culture is reflected by a fuzzy blob on such a graph, not by a point. However my position is that we need to be aware of these dynamics, and we need to be consciously encouraging those aspects of culture that shift more to the creative and collaborative, to be able to adapt to the deep systemic forces. In such situations of duress many systems actually do the opposite and become more conformist and more competitive, they take refuge in the familiar as it provides the illusion of safety &#8211; but that response reduces the viability of the system to changed circumstance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazzmann91</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>jazzmann91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-163</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the divisive nature of the comparisons.  We need all four quadrants or we risk repeating the failures of our divisive ancestors.  There is no reason we can&#039;t have all four of those people in a room agreeing on which direction to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t like the divisive nature of the comparisons.  We need all four quadrants or we risk repeating the failures of our divisive ancestors.  There is no reason we can&#39;t have all four of those people in a room agreeing on which direction to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Kastelle</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Kastelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-162</guid>
		<description>I love the idea of Deep Innovation David - definitely worth exploring it in more detail.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, thanks for adding my blog to your blogroll - I appreciate it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Finally - a very screwy question - I use that Darwin quote quite a bit myself.  I read somewhere (can&#039;t remember where exactly) that it is not actually a direct quote - have you read it directly in something by Darwin, or did you pick it up elsewhere like I have?  Would love to find the source for it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of Deep Innovation David &#8211; definitely worth exploring it in more detail.</p>
<p>Also, thanks for adding my blog to your blogroll &#8211; I appreciate it!</p>
<p>Finally &#8211; a very screwy question &#8211; I use that Darwin quote quite a bit myself.  I read somewhere (can&#39;t remember where exactly) that it is not actually a direct quote &#8211; have you read it directly in something by Darwin, or did you pick it up elsewhere like I have?  Would love to find the source for it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidhodgson</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>davidhodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-160</guid>
		<description>In this case it is true that competition vastly increased innovation, because the competition drove the creativity. AT&amp;T without the competition was not a creative culture, it was a conformist one. The key is if the intrinsic motivation is towards exploring ways to make things better, or if it is towards making money. If the systemic driver is purely financial then innovation will primarily only be driven by the threat of competition, because creativity is always an inefficient process. That the systemic driver is financial however is an artifact of our human created economic system, which is not a fact of nature. As I&#039;ve talked about in other blog posts we need to shift the way we measure success within our economic system so that we are aimed towards increasing human wellbeing, not increasing financial growth. The two are not correlated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this case it is true that competition vastly increased innovation, because the competition drove the creativity. AT&#038;T without the competition was not a creative culture, it was a conformist one. The key is if the intrinsic motivation is towards exploring ways to make things better, or if it is towards making money. If the systemic driver is purely financial then innovation will primarily only be driven by the threat of competition, because creativity is always an inefficient process. That the systemic driver is financial however is an artifact of our human created economic system, which is not a fact of nature. As I&#39;ve talked about in other blog posts we need to shift the way we measure success within our economic system so that we are aimed towards increasing human wellbeing, not increasing financial growth. The two are not correlated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Roberts</title>
		<link>http://theideahive.com/2009/12/a-culture-of-innovation-is-the-key-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theideahive.com/?p=658#comment-159</guid>
		<description>hmmm. I fear that often we confuse innovation with technology.  Innovation is more about thinking--and perhaps questioning simple bipolar metaphors? :)  &lt;br&gt;How wonderful if we could innovate how we think and what we value rather than what we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm. I fear that often we confuse innovation with technology.  Innovation is more about thinking&#8211;and perhaps questioning simple bipolar metaphors? <img src='http://theideahive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   <br />How wonderful if we could innovate how we think and what we value rather than what we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.328 seconds -->

